Author Topic: NY / Rochester - 2008-15  (Read 29398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline carly

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,399
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #279 on: June 29, 2010, 12:48 »
Part of the reason they have so much coverage is that they didn't know where they would nest this year.  When Kodak started renovating and before our Mariah lost her territory they put up several nest boxes in the area and had 3 of them hooked up with cams hoping she would choose one.  I think they moved one of the cams from the other boxes over to this one they've chosen which accounts for all the great coverage!

Offline AnimalLover

  • Past Member
  • Hatchling
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #278 on: June 29, 2010, 12:02 »

It is so cool the chics have fledged and they are fillowing then around with a remote cam.  The chics are on 2 different buildings and they have a cam on each one it is so cool to watch them fledge!

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7969874

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/rochester-falcons-at-times-square-nest-box

Offline Kinderchick

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,944
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #277 on: June 10, 2010, 16:13 »
I really like these names. :) Could be called "Jemi" and "Calli", for short. ;)

Offline carly

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,399
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #276 on: June 10, 2010, 10:21 »
Two girls  :-* :-*

Jemison-- 95/w (black over green) with blue tape
Callidora-- 96/w (black over green) with red tape

Offline carly

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,399
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #275 on: June 10, 2010, 05:05 »
Banding of the two beauties today at 10:00 am and they will be showing it live on the webcam!  Directions here as they have both refresh and live streaming cams.

http://rfalconcam.com/imprinting/

Offline Kinderchick

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,944
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #274 on: May 26, 2010, 20:02 »
Beauty looking proud of her chicks:
She does look proud of her chicks, Alison! And Beauty sure is a beauty! :D

Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #273 on: May 26, 2010, 19:26 »
Beauty looking proud of her chicks:



Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #272 on: May 23, 2010, 15:40 »
Beauty with the two chicks today:



Offline carly

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,399
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #271 on: May 18, 2010, 19:18 »
What a great view, it's like you are right in there with her!!

Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #270 on: May 18, 2010, 19:16 »
Looks like it could be 2 hatches. :-\

Yes, there are two chicks!

Offline Kinderchick

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,944
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #269 on: May 18, 2010, 19:05 »
Looks like it could be 2 hatches. :-\

Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #268 on: May 18, 2010, 19:03 »
Congratulations to Beauty and Archer!

One hatch or two? These pieces of eggshell might be too large to make up one egg:



Offline carly

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,399
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #267 on: May 18, 2010, 16:10 »
First hatch here a little after 3 pm!!!  Congratulations to Archer and Beauty and to all the Rochester fans who have waited patiently and endured so much the past year!!

 ;D ;D

Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #266 on: May 01, 2010, 15:52 »
Beauty with the three remaining eggs:



Offline Alison

  • Phanatic
  • Old Bird
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,402
Re: Rochester - 2010 / Archer & Beauty
« Reply #265 on: April 27, 2010, 16:25 »
The egg which was removed looked like an infertile egg. Photo from Imprints: